Predynastic Lug-Handled Vessel, 4000 to 3000 BCE
Alabaster
31.5 x 12.5 cm
12 3/8 x 4 7/8 in
12 3/8 x 4 7/8 in
LI.1026
Further images
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 1
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 2
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 3
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 4
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 5
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 6
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 7
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 8
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 9
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 10
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 11
)
When we think about the great inventions that have shaped human history – farming, the wheel, the harnessing of electricity, the internet – it is easy to forget the humble...
When we think about the great inventions that have shaped human history – farming, the wheel, the harnessing of electricity, the internet – it is easy to forget the humble vessel. A watertight container for the transportation and storage of liquids, vessels of all kinds were vital for everyday life in the ancient world. Their centrality ensured that vessels of all kinds were commonly buried with individuals, and vessels with fine decoration or made out of rare or hard-to-work materials became important status-symbols. In Predynastic Egypt – before the country was unified under the first Pharaoh, named variously as Narmer or Menes – the stone vessel became the characteristic funerary good. More durable than their pottery counterparts, stone vessels express the Egyptian desire for the provision of individuals in the afterlife – preferably for all eternity. In the later Egyptian worldview, which all the evidence indicates prevailed in some form in the Predynastic, the soul (akh) was a multipartite conception, which existed in parallel with the body (khaw, a plural word meaning ‘the sum of the bodily parts’). The funerary texts reference eight elements to the soul: kht (physical body), sah (spiritual body), rn (the spoken name, identity), ba (personality, individuality), ka (‘double’, the vital essence), ib (the heart, seat of knowledge and emotion), shut (the shadow), and skhm (the ‘power’). These elements existed in an interconnected way, and all eight were necessary in some way to enter the afterlife. The importance of the kht, for example, ensured that the Egyptians went to great extents to ensure the preservation of the physical body, originally natural forms of preservation in the dry sands of the desert but eventually through the artificial process of mummification. Two of the most important elements – the ka and ba – were considered to become corporeal following death, and required sustenance in perpetuity thereafter.
In the tomb, then, the ka (and to a lesser extent, the ba) required food and drink in order to survive. These were provided both in the form of goods buried with the deceased, but also in offerings made daily to the spirits of the deceased. Later, these offerings were made in a chapel associated with the tomb, a publicly accessible part of the tomb infrastructure. But in the Predynastic, offerings were probably made in the open air, near the burial itself. Given that most burials occurred in simple pits, with no superstructure, there was no way of guaranteeing the survival of the goods buried with the deceased. Stone vessels were the answer to this problem: whereas the pottery vessels of everyday life were easily broken, stone vessels were durable enough to sustain the ka in perpetuity. While most of these stone vessels were associated with the physical sustenance of the ka, it should be noted that the Egyptians did not believe in mere survival. For the Egyptians, life was – at least in part – about pleasure (htpw), which was considered a gift from the gods. Obsessed with sensory enjoyment, the Egyptians esteemed scent (khnm), appearance, flavour, touch and comfort. As a result a great many of the vessels interred with Predynastic Egyptians were designed to contain perfumes, oils, unguents and cosmetics. In many cases, these vessels were dramatically oversized, reflecting the desire of the individual to enjoy abundance in the afterlife. Even if the vessel was empty, as was often the case, the mere presence of the appropriate container could ensure that the ka wss well provided-for.
This type of vessel, found throughout Egyptian history, is known variously as a ‘torpedo vessel’, ‘torpedo amphora’, ‘carinated amphora’ or ‘Canaanite amphora’. The last moniker refers to the prevailing belief that this form originated in the Levant, was exported to Egypt, and thereafter became a staple of Egyptian potters and stoneworkers. The Egyptian product, however, can be distinguished by the roundness of the base. Later Phoenician and Levantine torpedo amphorae (e.g. Metropolitan Museum of Art 74.51.2298, British Museum EA.22346) tend to have a dramatically pointed bottom, for driving into the sand so that it can stand upright. Egyptian vases may have had bases, but more likely, were designed to be suspended from strings looped through the holes in the centre of the lug handles. The vessel is of a classic form – categorised by Petrie as his no. 931 (Petrie, W. M. F. (1937) The Funeral Furniture of Egypt, with Stone and Metal Vases. London) – which appeared during the Predynastic, and is known both with and without lug or nub handles. In later periods, notably the Twenty-First Dynasty, these vessels became associated with a ritual to placate the ‘dangerous goddess’. Sekhmet, the Eye of Ra (irt Ra), was a fearsome lioness goddess who in myth had a famous bloodlust. When the sun god Ra, who was reigning as Pharaoh on earth, heard of a plot to oust him. He instructed his daughter, Sekhmet, to deal with the plotters, though her bloodlust became too great and she grew close to wiping out mankind entirely. Ra placated her by digging a lake, and filling it with beer coloured to look like blood. Sekhmet drank heartily of it, then fell drunk, thus saving humanity. In the rituals of the ‘dangerous goddess’, red wine was used to the same effect, stored in vessels like these. In earlier periods, it is unclear what their purpose might have been. Alabaster examples, such as this one, were most likely from a funerary context, since stone was a more durable alternative to pottery. It is likely that this vessel was an oversized unguent or oil vessel. Re. 1600002.
In the tomb, then, the ka (and to a lesser extent, the ba) required food and drink in order to survive. These were provided both in the form of goods buried with the deceased, but also in offerings made daily to the spirits of the deceased. Later, these offerings were made in a chapel associated with the tomb, a publicly accessible part of the tomb infrastructure. But in the Predynastic, offerings were probably made in the open air, near the burial itself. Given that most burials occurred in simple pits, with no superstructure, there was no way of guaranteeing the survival of the goods buried with the deceased. Stone vessels were the answer to this problem: whereas the pottery vessels of everyday life were easily broken, stone vessels were durable enough to sustain the ka in perpetuity. While most of these stone vessels were associated with the physical sustenance of the ka, it should be noted that the Egyptians did not believe in mere survival. For the Egyptians, life was – at least in part – about pleasure (htpw), which was considered a gift from the gods. Obsessed with sensory enjoyment, the Egyptians esteemed scent (khnm), appearance, flavour, touch and comfort. As a result a great many of the vessels interred with Predynastic Egyptians were designed to contain perfumes, oils, unguents and cosmetics. In many cases, these vessels were dramatically oversized, reflecting the desire of the individual to enjoy abundance in the afterlife. Even if the vessel was empty, as was often the case, the mere presence of the appropriate container could ensure that the ka wss well provided-for.
This type of vessel, found throughout Egyptian history, is known variously as a ‘torpedo vessel’, ‘torpedo amphora’, ‘carinated amphora’ or ‘Canaanite amphora’. The last moniker refers to the prevailing belief that this form originated in the Levant, was exported to Egypt, and thereafter became a staple of Egyptian potters and stoneworkers. The Egyptian product, however, can be distinguished by the roundness of the base. Later Phoenician and Levantine torpedo amphorae (e.g. Metropolitan Museum of Art 74.51.2298, British Museum EA.22346) tend to have a dramatically pointed bottom, for driving into the sand so that it can stand upright. Egyptian vases may have had bases, but more likely, were designed to be suspended from strings looped through the holes in the centre of the lug handles. The vessel is of a classic form – categorised by Petrie as his no. 931 (Petrie, W. M. F. (1937) The Funeral Furniture of Egypt, with Stone and Metal Vases. London) – which appeared during the Predynastic, and is known both with and without lug or nub handles. In later periods, notably the Twenty-First Dynasty, these vessels became associated with a ritual to placate the ‘dangerous goddess’. Sekhmet, the Eye of Ra (irt Ra), was a fearsome lioness goddess who in myth had a famous bloodlust. When the sun god Ra, who was reigning as Pharaoh on earth, heard of a plot to oust him. He instructed his daughter, Sekhmet, to deal with the plotters, though her bloodlust became too great and she grew close to wiping out mankind entirely. Ra placated her by digging a lake, and filling it with beer coloured to look like blood. Sekhmet drank heartily of it, then fell drunk, thus saving humanity. In the rituals of the ‘dangerous goddess’, red wine was used to the same effect, stored in vessels like these. In earlier periods, it is unclear what their purpose might have been. Alabaster examples, such as this one, were most likely from a funerary context, since stone was a more durable alternative to pottery. It is likely that this vessel was an oversized unguent or oil vessel. Re. 1600002.